DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00689-14
15 May 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 May 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ©
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. ,
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 13 August 2002. On 22 April 2004, you received
counseling for failure to obey an order/regulation by going
outside military boundaries to Mexico without authorization and
conduct unbecoming a service member by causing disorder and/or
neglect. On 23 January 2006, you received nonjudicial .
punishment (NJP) for being in an unauthorized absence (UA)
status for two days and making a false official statement. You
were separated on 14 August 2006, with an honorable
characterization of service and assigned an RE-4 (not
recommended for reenlistment) reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in
your case, including your medical condition. However, the Board
found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in
your reenlistment code, given your record of NUP for misconduct
and non-recommendation for reenlistment. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZASALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR028 14
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6538 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5810 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. On 4 April 2008, you were discharged with a general characterization of service due to unsatisfactory participation and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR632 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0185 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3903 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2014. In regard to your request for separation pay, the Board noted that this action was completed on 7 August 2013, and as such, no further consideration is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0729 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0694 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7013 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4098-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 26 March 2014. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all .potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, prior honorable service, and desire to change your reenlistment code for. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that - _@ presumption of regularity attaches_to all official records= “Consequently, when...